The Four-Day Work Week and the Death of the Flexible Workplace Initiative


Featured Guest Blogger January 19th, 2009

Margaret M. DiBianca joined Young Conaway’s Employment Group after graduating magna cum laude from Villanova University School of Law. Molly is a monthly contributor to the Delaware Employment Law Letter and is the acting Editor of Young Conaway’s employment-law blog, DelawareEmploymentLawBlog.com. Please note that the views of our guest bloggers do not necessarily reflect the views of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.

The four-day work week has been hyped as the solution to the search for a flexible workplace. This is nothing more than hype. Truth be told, the four-day workweek is the antithesis of flexibility.

The demands for scheduling with employees change from employee to employee and, even with one individual, are subject to change depending on what else is happening in his or her life. The only thing that is static and unchanging in this definition of flexibility is the employee’s request to define their schedule for themselves and to change it as needed.

The four-day work week falls far short of this test for flexibility. Instead of being able to come and go on a schedule that is adaptable to their needs and the needs of their friends and families, employees are required to be in the workplace for at least 11 hours every day for the same four consecutive days each week. If your doctor’s office is closed on Friday, you’re plain out of luck. If you need to pick up your daughter after school, there’s not much hope that you could come into work early to make up the time—unless you want to arrive at 4 a.m. to ensure that you can leave by 3 that afternoon.

If the strict hours don’t bother you, consider the lack of flexibility during non-working time in a four-day work week. Employees who leave work by 5 p.m. five days a week are able to run an errand or two on the way to pick the kids up from day care. Once home, there is time to put something on the table for dinner and oversee homework time. Parents can leave work in time for the weeknight soccer game or recital—without having to take a half day of leave.

For the employee working four 10-hour days each week, these options become much more difficult to effectuate. In order to get the family up and out the door, drop the children off at school, commute to the office, and still make it to work on time, most people need between 90 and 180 minutes after waking. We’ll estimate it on the short side and say that an employee who is due to work by 7 a.m. has to get up no later than 5:30 a.m. Eleven hours later, at 6 p.m., the employee leaves work, picks up the children, and stops to put gasoline in the car. Assuming they make no other stops, they return home at 7 p.m. At the later hour, it’s exhausting to think about cooking, so a delivery order is called into the local pizza parlor.

Read the mail, change clothes, check the answering machine, and set the table and it’s already 8 p.m. Only two and a half hours before bedtime if you hope to get close to 8 hours’ sleep. By the time the pizza arrives, is gobbled down, and is cleaned up, the so-called “quality time” with the family is over and everyone heads to bed. There isn’t even time for “American Idol,” never mind a few moments to talk about the day’s events.

With this schedule, the four-day work week seems far from flexible. Instead, it seems to be all-consuming and, frankly, exhausting.

6 Responses to “The Four-Day Work Week and the Death of the Flexible Workplace Initiative”

  1. Carol Murrayon 23 Jan 2009 at 4:28 pm

    I appreciate and agree with your evaluation of the 4 day
    work week. However in your illustration you assumed the
    the employeeworking the 4 day week did not have a
    partner to help with the additional responsibilities.
    In addition there are many single workers who may not
    have the family responsibilities you name.

    I have had both 4 and 5 day employees. Depending on
    individual circumstances and the work a 4 day work week
    may be appropriate.

  2. Pam Hinsonon 23 Jan 2009 at 5:48 pm

    Carol I have to disagree with you a bit. I have a husband that would be more than willing to take up my “slack” if I were to work a 4-day schedule. However, the more important issue is that even though I would have a 3-day weekend, I still would not be able to use that Friday to catch up on time with my family. My husband would still be at work and my daughter would still be at school. Friday would be spent recuperating from an exhausting week (I have a 1 hour drive to work) and then trying to get errands done before the family got home. Exhausted again and I still only have 2 days of the weekend left. Maybe some family time on Saturday and then Sunday is spent doing laundry and getting the family ready to start it all over again on Monday. Yes, maybe for a select few people a 4-day work week would be ideal but for the majority, probably not. Hey, it worked great when my husband was able to work 4-10 hr days but then again, I was working a lot closer to home and didn’t have a daughter to care for.

  3. Judyon 26 Jan 2009 at 11:54 am

    This is a great piece that brings up some good issues. My only thought
    is that you assume that everyone has to be in work the same four days.
    I would think that it could vary employee to employee and even week to
    week. More confusing perhaps but not more so than someone with varying
    hours each day of the week.

    In that perfect work world - you would have x number of hours to be worked
    and you could decide how to work them including Saturday or Sunday if
    so desired.

  4. bajar de pesoon 03 Apr 2009 at 12:03 am

    This is a real good post and some real interesting issues are brought up.

  5. Ezinezon 28 Jun 2009 at 1:42 pm

    Nice post, very useful informations here, my eyes are open now.
    Thank you.
    ezines

  6. A1Articleon 25 Jul 2009 at 5:31 am

    4-day work week is very great, now I must work 6 days a week and do not know about the future.

Comments RSS

Leave a Reply