<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do We Really Need Public Policies To Encourage Flexible Work?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/blog/do-we-really-need-public-policies-to-encourage-flexible-work/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/blog/do-we-really-need-public-policies-to-encourage-flexible-work</link>
	<description>Work and Family Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Juliet Bourke</title>
		<link>http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/blog/do-we-really-need-public-policies-to-encourage-flexible-work/comment-page-1#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Juliet Bourke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wfnetwork.bc.edu/blog/?p=856#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>Sandy, I love your metaphor of an iceberg melting.  Thanks for your blog.  

I'm not sure if recent changes in Australia will provide a suitable model for the US, but we have certainly taken a step forward with the "stick" approach by introducing the legislative "right to request" flexibility for certain categories of employees (namely those with young children, or a child with a disability).  Well perhaps it is more like a twig, given that eligible employees cannot litigate a refusal easily.  

More positively, what the new legislation does do (effective 1 January 2010) is provide a platform for employees to talk about their flexible work practice needs with their employer - and an employer must accede to a request unless it can demonstrate "reasonable business grounds" to the contrary.  This will require employers to make decisions based on evidence - and that alone is a positive step forward. 

For more information see a blog I wrote on   http://www.workplaceflexibility.com.au/new_right_to_request_flexibility_in_Australia.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandy, I love your metaphor of an iceberg melting.  Thanks for your blog.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if recent changes in Australia will provide a suitable model for the US, but we have certainly taken a step forward with the &#8220;stick&#8221; approach by introducing the legislative &#8220;right to request&#8221; flexibility for certain categories of employees (namely those with young children, or a child with a disability).  Well perhaps it is more like a twig, given that eligible employees cannot litigate a refusal easily.  </p>
<p>More positively, what the new legislation does do (effective 1 January 2010) is provide a platform for employees to talk about their flexible work practice needs with their employer - and an employer must accede to a request unless it can demonstrate &#8220;reasonable business grounds&#8221; to the contrary.  This will require employers to make decisions based on evidence - and that alone is a positive step forward. </p>
<p>For more information see a blog I wrote on   <a href="http://www.workplaceflexibility.com.au/new_right_to_request_flexibility_in_Australia.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.workplaceflexibility.com.au/new_right_to_request_flexibility_in_Australia.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
